On Revere Beach – Valet parking would solve a lot of problems

The parking curfew along the length of Revere Beach should not be altered to suit the specific needs of various businesses operating on Revere Beach.

The parking curfew right now treats everyone equally – and this is the way it should remain in order for it to be fairly implemented.

The State Police have said this and made it clear.

We entirely agree with the State Police in this instance.

That being said, if any business – and it is mainly restaurants crying out for help – needs additional parking, there is plenty of room in parking lots on Ocean Avenue that could accommodate hundreds of automobiles as part of a valet parking system.

Valet parking is flawless when run correctly.

Valet parking for those businesses without enough private parking is the way to go – not apportioning spaces to various businesses at the expense of a very well run parking curfew operation.

The state cannot be placed in the position of selling, apportioning or leasing public parking spaces along the beach to bars and restaurants that claim to need them.

190 comments for “On Revere Beach – Valet parking would solve a lot of problems

  1. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  2. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  3. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  4. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  5. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  6. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  7. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  8. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  9. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  10. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  11. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  12. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  13. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  14. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  15. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  16. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  17. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  18. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  19. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  20. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  21. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  22. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  23. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  24. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  25. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  26. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  27. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  28. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  29. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  30. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  31. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  32. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  33. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  34. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  35. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  36. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  37. Valetparkandgo
    August 25, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Valet Parking spaces have to be easily located near any location. Ocean ave would not be the place to store cars whose owners are using most Revere Beach restaurants as the land is located too far away.It is not cost effective.

  38. Pat Benti
    September 15, 2010 at 12:44 am

    I’ve always said that meters should be installed all along Revere Beach and Ocean Ave giving the City of Revere much needed revenue and funding towards special events during the summer. Therefore allowing restaurants parking so that customers don’t have to suddenly leave their guest and dinner in order to rush out so they don’t get towed. There must be a solution that ALL can agree on so that it is a win/win for everyone.

    PB

  39. bo bo
    September 26, 2010 at 4:22 am

    Sure everyone is treated equally. Everyone is treated like they live in a backwards looking, fearful, sorry town. Does anyone here wonder why senior citizens and very poor people are the majority of people who live in this town? Dive bars, bad restaurants, and retirement homes masquerading apartment buildings? Where are the young professionals? Where is the future for this town…Oh, I know, casinos! That will really improve things.

  40. bo bo
    September 26, 2010 at 4:23 am

    Bottom line. Old people are scared that people with dark skin will be near their homes late at night. They would ban parking altogether if they could.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.