Divided We Fall: School Officials, Mayor Indicate That Middle School Lottery Has Brought out the Worst in Adult Community

The middle school lottery over the last several years has never been an easy process, but administrators say it has become downright disturbing this year.

In the three lotteries staged over the last five years by the School Department, there have been tears from children, angry parents, arguments and harsh language.

The lottery has always been controversial because some feel they lose out on the “best” school for their kids. Because parents overwhelmingly choose the Susan B. Anthony (SBA) on the west side of the city and the Rumney Marsh Academy (RMA) in the central part of the city – and reject the Garfield Middle on the east side – a lottery drawing for seats in the overcrowded schools has to be conducted. Long-time established residents have often watched as their children were “beaten” out by children who had just rolled into town, sparking some measure of documented outrage.

This year, however, school officials said they feel it has brought a previously unspoken prejudice out into the open.

Superintendent Paul Dakin said that the administration has finished the middle school lottery appeals process this week, rejecting all 37 appeals, and it has left him with more than just a sour taste in his mouth.

It has left him with the awful smell of hatred.

“I’ve never had this so much before, but something in this community is coming to a boil,” said Dakin. “Some of  the parents have expressed themselves in a way that hints to me of an open prejudice. They are saying to me outright that there are too many minorities at the Garfield and they don’t want their kids with them. They don’t like the section of the city where the Garfield is and they are saying all this openly. There’s a prejudice I’m seeing here and it troubles me and saddens me.”

Mayor Tom Ambrosino felt similar frustrations, saying that the middle school desegregation plan helps kids get along better at high school.

“I agree with Dr. Dakin that sentiment exists and it is sad,” said the mayor. “We built these schools and got 90 percent funding from the state based on the fact that we said we were going to desegregate the schools in the city at the middle school level. We’ve done it now, and desegregation is not going to happen if we make these neighborhood schools now … That plan was conceived at the middle schools so that kids would interact with other kids early and by the time they get to the high school, we wouldn’t see the problems that are experienced in other communities. The high school isn’t perfect, but given the number of languages and nationalities that exist there, I think it runs very well.”

Ironically, the middle school problem only began once the new schools were built five years ago.

Before the SBA and RMA were built, there were only two middle schools and they were both on the east side of the city – the Beachmont and the Garfield.

As it happens, no one really complained about that situation at all, and it was never really an issue for parents that their kids were going to the Garfield. In fact, many parents were adamant to get their kids into the Garfield in order to participate in that school’s specialized math, science and technology programs.

It all changed with the new schools, with many parents on the west side of the city wanting their children to stay on the west side. Dakin said the lottery problem was always mostly about proximity, perhaps with a hint of prejudice in the underlying discussion.

Now, according to Dakin, that prejudice has come out in the open and it’s spreading rapidly amongst some.

“I’m getting it at the high school too,” he said.

Dakin said that a telephone message was accidentally sent out from RHS only in Spanish last week. It was supposed to go out in English and Spanish, as directed by state law.

The simple mistake spawned scores of angry calls.

A similar situation has also erupted with letters sent home from the schools that are translated into several different languages in addition to English.

“These things are done by law,” said Dakin. “If we want to keep receiving federal dollars we have to do that. We have the Office of Civil Rights in here helping us and showing us what we have to do. The community I grew up in is, in the year 2011, in the throws of not embracing diversity and it saddens me. Every generation of immigrants coming through here has ultimately acclimated to this country…It’s sad in this day and age that tolerance is headed in such a negative direction.”

Dakin added that many of the ideas about the Garfield Middle School aren’t even necessarily true, as it is only slightly more diverse economically and racially as the other middle schools, and probably less so than some elementary schools.

“This is more of an adult prejudice problem I’m seeing and not one that has to do with the kids,” said Dakin. “I have concerns when parents tell me they don’t want their kids to go to the Garfield because there are too many kids in poverty there and there might be too many minorities there. There’s major misconceptions based upon prejudice that are surfacing in the adult community and I’ve never felt it like this before.”

6 comments for “Divided We Fall: School Officials, Mayor Indicate That Middle School Lottery Has Brought out the Worst in Adult Community

  1. Fedup
    August 18, 2011 at 1:43 am

    Hey Tom where did your daughter go to school-thats right she was one of the lucky “lottery winners” along with Maguires kids who went to SBA.  Only the working class stiffs get screwed and end up at the Garfield, all the special people with City Hall connections just happen to be lucky and win the lottery.

    As for Dakin, prejudice-didn’t his son’s go to Savio-so much for be intergrated.

  2. Fedup
    August 18, 2011 at 1:43 am

    Hey Tom where did your daughter go to school-thats right she was one of the lucky “lottery winners” along with Maguires kids who went to SBA.  Only the working class stiffs get screwed and end up at the Garfield, all the special people with City Hall connections just happen to be lucky and win the lottery.

    As for Dakin, prejudice-didn’t his son’s go to Savio-so much for be intergrated.

  3. August 18, 2011 at 8:06 am

    It has been a long time since I first entered freshmen year at RHS but as I recall there was a heated rivalry between Whelan,Beachmont,Lincoln,Paul Revere, and McKinley kids at the time(no Garfield then it had been merged into Beachmont). I think it lasted until about Lunch when the boys from each school realized there was an entire new crop of girls from other schools. Every now and then you would hear it in a bit of trash talk on a court or field. I can recall a coach saying ” You Beachmont kids just don’t listen! IS IT THE PLANES HAVE YOU ALL DEAF!?!

     Different times I suppose. I will say that several families in Beachmont were disturbed about all the perceived “class mixing” when Garfield kids (from the old Garfield) were merged into Beachmont. Looking back I know they were no worse or better off  than we were and by the time 7th grade rolled around we were all friends.

      I think as long as it is conducted properly the Lotto could be a positive thing. However as the comment before mine shows several people voice their displeasure at what they feel are inconsistencies in the results.  Is it held in public? Perhaps turning the conducting of the LOTTO over to a 3rd party like a state official would go a long way to satisfying people’s suspicions? Some other thoughts/questions. If you win the first year of middle school are you locked in as a winner for the second year or does your name go back into the lotto? Perhaps if people knew they had another shot next year they would not be so disappointed? If mixing is good than attending one of the “good schools” one year and one of the other schools the next is better right? If we have to do this to keep the funding let’s do it as fairly as possible.

    I ask these questions not knowing the details of how the LOTTO is conducted.

  4. August 18, 2011 at 8:08 am

    or what about if you win one year you got your 1 golden ticket and are now forbidden from entering the second year?

  5. Wintersnow29
    August 18, 2011 at 5:46 pm

    Sometimes when the public makes an outcry of injustice, the reaction by the “upholders of the law” is to hide behind the word prejudice.  Dr. Dakin and Mayor Ambrosino, thankfully you are mistaken in your assessment of the people of Revere.  Since I have moved here, I have seen more diversity and tolerance between cultures in my entire life.  In fact it goes beyond diversity and tolerance, its called friendship.  The public outcry is caused by the unfairness of the lottery system.  As someone as already stated, how lucky are the people with City Hall Connections to get into the schools that they selected?  For that matter if diversity is so important to them, why didn’t they choose the Garfield school?  As for me, I already know I have a fight on my hands when my children are in Middle and Elementary School.  There is no way, if one is attending Garfield, that both students will be able to make it to school on time.  As far as the telephone messages are concerned, please wake up to the fact that there were a multitude of mistakes made by your counsel.  Not only did a message go out only in Spanish but multiple messages went out in Spanish.  Although “these things are done by law”, where are our Civil Rights as American Citizens in getting the message in our native language – ENGLISH?

  6. jill
    August 18, 2011 at 10:11 pm

    So some of the parents are prejudice is that what you are saying? What about the others, what about the kids? Should all 37 of them be punished because of a small majority of parents that might be prejudiced? What about the kids or parents that need to be at a certain school because of another sibling so that they don’t have to drive across town to try and get their kids to 2 different schools at the same time. What about staying at the same school because of arts or music or science programs that they have been taking for 3 years and can’t continue to do at another school. What about emotional problems that they might be starting to get over and now they will start up again by being sent to a different school. So why should all 37 of these kids suffer because of this. What about the kids that don’t even live in this city and continue to go to our schools. Why is it fair that families that move into this city over the summer can pick the school that they want their child to go to but we as taxpayers of Revere can’t. This is not right. So you have rejected all 37 of these appeals to punish the parents, but in reality you are punishing the children. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.